Freight Equalization Policy: A Double-Edged Sword for Indian Industry

The dawn of our independence was a time of immense promise and daunting challenges. As a nation, we were eager to shed the shackles of colonialism and forge our destiny. Understandably, the government of the day, felt the weight of expectation, the need to hit the ground running and lay the foundations of a strong, prosperous India. The Freight Equalization Policy (FEP) of 1952 was among those landmark policies – implemented by the Indian government with the ambitious goal of fostering balanced industrial growth across the nation. By subsidizing the transportation of key industrial inputs like coal and iron ore, the FEP sought to level the playing field for regions lacking access to these vital resources. However, a closer look reveals a policy with both intended and unintended consequences, particularly for resource-rich states.

But despite its positive impacts, the FEP unintentionally had a significant crippling effect on resource-rich states, hindering their industrial development and contributing to regional disparities.

Here, we take a look into policy that often finds mention in debates such as cities like Mumbai seeing a demographic tilt due to influx from poorer states.

Objectives and Implementation of the FEP

The primary objective of the FEP was to mitigate the geographical disadvantages faced by regions located far from crucial industrial inputs. By subsidizing transportation costs, the policy aimed to encourage industries to set up in less resource-abundant regions, thereby promoting balanced industrial growth across the country.

Unintended Consequences for Resource-Rich States

The Freight Equalization Policy, while intended to promote equitable growth, had several unintended consequences for resource-rich states like Jharkhand, Odisha, and West Bengal. These states, endowed with abundant natural resources, were expected to become hubs for resource-based industries. However, the policy effectively neutralized their geographical advantage by reducing the significance of proximity to raw materials.

• Jharkhand and Bihar (Pre-2000): Rich in coal and iron ore, these regions experienced a decline in industrial growth as industries were incentivized to locate near consumer markets in coastal regions. This resulted in deindustrialization, job losses, and exacerbated the “resource curse” phenomenon.
• West Bengal: While West Bengal had a strong industrial base, the FEP increased competition from other regions, leading to a decline in certain sectors and contributing to regional disparities within the state.
• Odisha: Odisha, with its abundance of minerals, faced similar challenges as Jharkhand, with limited industrial growth due to the reduced importance of proximity to raw materials.

Long-Term Economic Consequences

The Freight Equalization Policy had significant long-term economic consequences for the affected states:

• Deindustrialization: The decline in industrial growth led to job losses and hindered economic diversification.
• Increased Poverty and Unemployment: The lack of industrial development contributed to high poverty rates and unemployment, particularly in rural areas.
• Regional Migration and Brain Drain: The scarcity of employment opportunities forced many skilled individuals to migrate to other parts of the country, leading to a brain drain.
• Widening Regional Disparities: The FEP contributed to significant regional disparities, with resource-rich states lagging behind more industrialized coastal regions.

Conclusion

The Freight Equalization Policy of 1952, while well-intentioned, had unintended consequences that significantly impacted the economic development of resource-rich states in India. The policy, by neutralizing the geographical advantages of these states, hindered their industrial growth and contributed to regional disparities. This analysis highlights the importance of carefully considering the potential unintended consequences of government policies on regional development and the need for more nuanced and region-specific approaches to fostering balanced and sustainable economic growth across the country.

Read books on Post-independence India:

We welcome your comments at letters@friedeye.com